RFL rule Louis tackle had 'potential for serious injury'
 |
| Louis Anderson |
AN RFL disciplinary panel handed Louis Anderson a one-match ban on Wednesday night after deciding his tackle on Huddersfield's Kevin Brown had 'potential for serious injury'.
Anderson was sent to the sin bin on Good Friday for a late tackle on the Giants kicker and was called to a hearing in Leeds on Wednesday, when he was given a one-game suspension and a £300 fine.
The final verdict read: "Committee take into account player's good previous record and his good character.
"Feel this offence can be down graded to category B rather than category C. However this type of offence has the potential for serious injury and must be marked with a suspension.
"In this instance because of all the circumstances the suspension can be limited."
Anderson pleaded not guilty to the offence but the RFL's compliance manager's submissions read: "Player intentionally made contact using his forearm with a Huddersfield player.
"The player was sin-binned in relation to the challenge being late and the incident was put on report in relation to the issue of point of contact."
The player's submissions read: "Player accompanied by Mr Lowes (Wolves assistant coach Jimmy Lowes). Player putting pressure on kicker. Does not raise his arm above his midriff height.
"Coached not to raise arms as ball may go to opponent's possession. Contact is shoulder to opponent's chest area.
"Player was fully committed and concedes slightly late but not with high forearm. Turned his body to avoid contact. Opponent not injured. Expected opponent to kick went with arms down."
In finding Anderson guilty, a statement about the decision read: "Committee having viewed DVD find this player guilty of a late high tackle on opponent.
"It is noted that the player and his representative accept the tackle may have been marginally late but indicate contact was on the opponent's chest area.
"The committee are satisfied this was a late challenge on the kicker and the contact was directed towards the opponent's head area.
"The DVD does not clearly show the use of the forearm arm and the opponent is afforded the benefit of the doubt in this respect that contact was with the shoulder. The tackle was careless and late and misconduct is made out."
12:05pm Thursday 27th March 2008
Print 
Email this
CommentPosted by: Dave Maskall, Azerbaijan on 6:58pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Unbelievable judgment - full of contradictions. If this had been a Saints, Wigan or Leeds player there would have been no ban.
Unbelievable!!!
Unbelievable judgment - full of contradictions. If this had been a Saints, Wigan or Leeds player there would have been no ban.
Unbelievable!!!
Posted by: Dave Maskall, Azerbaijan on 7:05pm Thu 27 Mar 08
"The DVD does not clearly show the use of the forearm arm and the opponent is afforded the benefit of the doubt in this respect that contact was with the shoulder."
If you cannot clearly see the "offense" how can you punish it? If contact was with the shoulder how can this be a punishable offense?
This review panel has absolutely no credibility in my opinion.
"The DVD does not clearly show the use of the forearm arm and the opponent is afforded the benefit of the doubt in this respect that contact was with the shoulder."
If you cannot clearly see the "offense" how can you punish it? If contact was with the shoulder how can this be a punishable offense?
This review panel has absolutely no credibility in my opinion.
Posted by: Tezzerwolf, warrington on 10:34pm Thu 27 Mar 08
If this had "potential to cause serious injury" heaven only knows what could have happened to Johnnos neck. NOW THE WIRE!!!!!!!!.
If this had "potential to cause serious injury" heaven only knows what could have happened to Johnnos neck. NOW THE WIRE!!!!!!!!.
Posted by: Tezzerwolf, warrington on 10:35pm Thu 27 Mar 08
If this had "potential to cause serious injury" heaven only knows what could have happened to Johnnos neck. NOW THE WIRE!!!!!!!!.
If this had "potential to cause serious injury" heaven only knows what could have happened to Johnnos neck. NOW THE WIRE!!!!!!!!.
Posted by: Neil, Sankey on 9:26am Fri 28 Mar 08
[quote][bold]Tezzerwolf[/bold] wrote:
If this had "potential to cause serious injury" heaven only knows what could have happened to Johnnos neck. NOW THE WIRE!!!!!!!!.[/quote] It's like already mentioned though sin against the wolves and ye shall not be punished, sin for the wolves and ye shall be punished unfairly. How many more times is stanley gene going to appear before the disciplinary before he is given a lengthy ban. We're 8 games into the season he has made three appearances and missed 2 of the 8 games through suspension and missed 1 through injury by my reckoning thats 3 appearances from 5 games. Pickersgill has appeared twice in his career and gets 2 games for the same offence where is the consistency?
Tezzerwolf wrote:
If this had "potential to cause serious injury" heaven only knows what could have happened to Johnnos neck. NOW THE WIRE!!!!!!!!.
It's like already mentioned though sin against the wolves and ye shall not be punished, sin for the wolves and ye shall be punished unfairly. How many more times is stanley gene going to appear before the disciplinary before he is given a lengthy ban. We're 8 games into the season he has made three appearances and missed 2 of the 8 games through suspension and missed 1 through injury by my reckoning thats 3 appearances from 5 games. Pickersgill has appeared twice in his career and gets 2 games for the same offence where is the consistency?
Posted by: BJ, Woolston on 9:35am Fri 28 Mar 08
And why wasn't Brown's blatant trip punished. Use to be an auotomtic sending off.
RFL are losing their credibility with these decisioms.
And why wasn't Brown's blatant trip punished. Use to be an auotomtic sending off.
RFL are losing their credibility with these decisioms.
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!