News RSS Feed


Social care bears brunt of council cuts

3:05pm Monday 3rd March 2008

comment Comments (14)   Have your say »


TRAFFORD Council has highlighted six priority areas in its latest budget - and the areas it needs to cut back on to achieve them.

Key issues include better roads and pavements, a greener borough, maintaining a high standard of education, quality of care for adults, fighting crime and low council tax.

But social care services are to be cut back to achieve the aims.

These include:

*reductions of £300,000 to family centres,

*£20,000 over three years to youth services

*£626,000 over three years for home to school transport provision.

* £200,000 cuts to adoption placements,

*£511,000 in foster care fees,

*£50,000 to children's homes maintenance budgets

*£63,000 in the investment of children with complex needs.

*reductions to community service and adult social care - savings of £135,000

*a changed care model saves £500,000.

*cuts of £190,000 to home care and social enterprise

*staffing cuts in 2007/08 mean savings of £248,000 this year.

*Changes to the eligibility criteria of certain benefits for older people's services - savings of £120,000

*cuts of £50,000 to community meals.

*savings of £98,000 made after eligibility criteria is altered for claims from the physically disabled

*£100,000 reduction in equipment provision.

*for people with learning disabilities additional Primary Care Trust (PCT) contributions will mean savings of £650,000.

*those with physical disabilities will see a reduction of five per cent in residential or supported housing, leading to a council saving of £65,000.

*for people with learning disabilities the same cuts will lead to a saving of £256,000

*for those with mental health problems £94,000.

As well as a 4.94 per cent rise in council tax there will also be an increase in parking charges across the borough with savings of £55,000 made when Regent Road car park in Altrincham becomes pay and display. A total of £200,000 will be saved on on-street pay and display charges review, £100,000 with an off-street pay and display charges review and £16,000 with extended hours on off-street pay and display.

A further £570,000 will be saved with the employment of transport cost efficiencies across the borough.

At the council budget meeting Labour Cllr Barry Brotherton said: "Again this budget is the usual litany of cuts, so-called service realignments and increased charges that we've come to expect from this administration over the past four years."

"Once more the elderly and vulnerable will have to pay, some up to £15 a week more, for the help they receive from social services. Others will find due to the changes in the qualifying criteria they will now receive much less help or indeed none at all."

"A lot of money is to be spent on highways. Everyone can see this work, although many understand that much of it is purely cosmetic.

"We will be watching that this money is spent fairly across the whole borough and not disproportionately in Timperley and Altrincham!"

The council has worked with accountants KPMG on an efficiency programme.

Council leader Cllr Susan Williams said: "The claim that there are cuts to services and the quality of services by Cllr Brotherton is misleading. A lot of these savings are providing the same service for less money or providing an enhanced service. The efficiency programme changes the way we provide a service but despite savings we will maintain or enhance services delivered in Trafford.

Talking about investment in highways as a priority Cllr Williams added: "Our highways are an asset and if we don't invest in them they will deteriorate and we will have costs incurred for slip and trip claims due to bad quality roads.

"There is no evidence to back up disproportionate spending in Timperley and Altrincham and none was given.

"Cllr Brotherton said our Dedicated Schools Grant has had one of the biggest increases in the country but we're still one of the worst funded. The increase is big but the figure is still low."

"We're genuinely operating in very tight circumstances with an efficiency programme to improve frontline services."

hannah.al-taraboulsy@ messengernewspapers.co.uk


Your Say YourTrafford

60schild, Sale says...
5:47pm Mon 3 Mar 08

It's getting harder to see how this council can justify nearly 5% rise in council tax and cut services. There have been two street lamps on Sidmouth Road in Sale that have not been working since December. The services we pay for are getting worse and yet we are expected to pay more - unbelievable!!!!

60schild, Sale says...
5:47pm Mon 3 Mar 08

It's getting harder to see how this council can justify nearly 5% rise in council tax and cut services. There have been two street lamps on Sidmouth Road in Sale that have not been working since December. The services we pay for are getting worse and yet we are expected to pay more - unbelievable!!!!

R Jones, Trafford says...
6:35pm Mon 3 Mar 08

60schild wrote:
It's getting harder to see how this council can justify nearly 5% rise in council tax and cut services. There have been two street lamps on Sidmouth Road in Sale that have not been working since December. The services we pay for are getting worse and yet we are expected to pay more - unbelievable!!!!
I agree, these cuts are wrong. It seems to me that the Concervatives have well and truly got it in for the elderly of Trafford. How can they expect us to pay more for less. They are making themselves very unpopular.

R Jones, Trafford says...
6:35pm Mon 3 Mar 08

60schild wrote:
It's getting harder to see how this council can justify nearly 5% rise in council tax and cut services. There have been two street lamps on Sidmouth Road in Sale that have not been working since December. The services we pay for are getting worse and yet we are expected to pay more - unbelievable!!!!
I agree, these cuts are wrong. It seems to me that the Concervatives have well and truly got it in for the elderly of Trafford. How can they expect us to pay more for less. They are making themselves very unpopular.

Sid, Urmston says...
9:51pm Mon 3 Mar 08

The sooner this bunch are kicked out the better. Everybody remember this come voting time.

Sid, Urmston says...
9:51pm Mon 3 Mar 08

The sooner this bunch are kicked out the better. Everybody remember this come voting time.

duncan, trafford says...
10:57pm Mon 3 Mar 08

ARE THERE GOING TO BE ANY CUTS IN THERE EXPENSES CLAIMS, I DONT THINK SO,ONLY THE SERVICES WILL SUFFER AND THE COUNCIL TAX PAYERS.

duncan, trafford says...
10:57pm Mon 3 Mar 08

ARE THERE GOING TO BE ANY CUTS IN THERE EXPENSES CLAIMS, I DONT THINK SO,ONLY THE SERVICES WILL SUFFER AND THE COUNCIL TAX PAYERS.

pam, sale says...
9:55am Tue 4 Mar 08

i'm happy to pay more council tax, parking charges and have less soical care as long as the streets are safe at night

pam, sale says...
9:55am Tue 4 Mar 08

i'm happy to pay more council tax, parking charges and have less soical care as long as the streets are safe at night

Matt, Altrincham says...
1:23pm Wed 5 Mar 08

I'm struggling to understand how an overall increase in social spending is a bad thing? According to the council tax info I've just recieved the increased in social spending is the main reason for the increase in tax.

Your listing of the cuts totals £5.6million. If they are reducing expenditure by £5.6 million for the year 2008/09 I'd love to see why we need to pay £3million more during that period.

Matt, Altrincham says...
1:23pm Wed 5 Mar 08

I'm struggling to understand how an overall increase in social spending is a bad thing? According to the council tax info I've just recieved the increased in social spending is the main reason for the increase in tax.

Your listing of the cuts totals £5.6million. If they are reducing expenditure by £5.6 million for the year 2008/09 I'd love to see why we need to pay £3million more during that period.

Barbara, says...
9:40pm Thu 6 Mar 08

I'm appalled at the thought of having beautiful pavements and roads in Timperley (where I live) at the expense of caring properly for our looked-after children (huge savings in reduced foster care fees) and our much needed youth services, which could be a vital key to reducing future youth crime and keeping our streets safe for all of us.

Barbara, says...
9:40pm Thu 6 Mar 08

I'm appalled at the thought of having beautiful pavements and roads in Timperley (where I live) at the expense of caring properly for our looked-after children (huge savings in reduced foster care fees) and our much needed youth services, which could be a vital key to reducing future youth crime and keeping our streets safe for all of us.

Your sayYourTrafford

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE This Is Cheshire account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Sponsored Links


Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »